Milieudefensie | Friends of the Earth Netherlands has been working towards a fair and sustainable world since 1971. And we’ve had our share of successes. From reduction of river pollution and the use of plastics to winning courtcases from Shell. It demonstrates that Milieudefensie has an impact on Dutch and European environmental and climate policies and practices, and is also creating ripples worldwide.
In the Climate Case appeal Shell vs Milieudefensie, the Court ruled that the oil and gas giant does have a responsibility to reduce its emissions, but has not imposed a concrete reduction obligation. However, this is a ruling for the entire business community and not just for Shell. The court makes it abundantly clear that not only countries, but also companies have a responsibility to reduce their emissions in line with the Paris Climate Agreement.
Through years of campaigning and lobbying we achieved great success: on May 24, 2024, the European Union introduced the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). We also call it the “don’t-look-away law”. Loosely translated, companies in Europe are no longer allowed to emit greenhouse gasses without limits; the law is requiring them to develop and implement climate transition plans aligned with the Paris Climate Agreement. From now on, large companies must demonstrate that they do not harm human rights, the environment, or the climate. And they must report on this annually, as stipulated in another directive, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Together, these two directives ensure that companies can no longer avoid it: a better environment starts with themselves.
In May 2024, the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) entered into force. Together with the Raw Materials Coalition we provided extensive critical input into the development of this European guideline. And we monitored the implementation of the European guideline at the national level.
Astra Agro Lestari is Indonesia's second-largest palm oil producer. Together with our sister-organizations in Indonesia, the UK and the US, we documented for years the company's abuses; deforestation, environmental pollution and land grabbing. We took the matter to the UN and were successful: the UN Special Rapporteur on Food denounced the devastating practices to the Indonesian government and Astra Agro Lestari.
Photograph: Inhabitants of Pungkat, a village in Indonesia, oppose the advancing palmoil industrie that threatens their way of live.
The Dutch dredging company Van Oord works with Dutch subsidies in Mozambique on a TotalEnergies gas project, amidst ongoing extreme violence. The project was halted, but the company intended to restart it in 2024. Thanks to research by Milieudefensie | FoE NL, published in collaboration with (inter)national partners, numerous parliamentary questions were raised in 2024 about Dutch involvement. This was followed by a motion from members of the Dutch House of Representatives.
Due to our concerned efforts, the gas project did not start in 2024. The work of our Mozambican partner Justica Ambiental was recognized in 2024 with the prestigious Right Livelihood Award (the alternative Nobel Prize).
A group of campanies, Astra International, Jardine Matheson Holdings, and Jardine Cycle & Carriage is causing significant damage to forests and the environment in Indonesia. Together with colleagues from WALHI, Friends of the Earth US and Friends of the Earth England, Wales & Northern Ireland, we sent extensive information to Norwegian investor, Norges Bank. The bank's ethics committee conducted its own extensive investigation and concluded that it is irresponsible to continue investing in these harmful companies.
In 2023, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises were revised. Together with OECD Watch, we ensured that Just Transition was included in the guidelines for the first time. In 2024, we monitored further development of this guideline for companies and discussed with the OECD how to formalize it.
Milieudefensie and the NewClimate Institute published the first groundbreaking ranking – the Climate Crisis Index - of climate plans of 29 major international companies and financial institutions. To meet the Paris Agreement target, these plans must outline how companies will realize a minimum of 45% CO2 reduction by 2030. The research showed that on average, the companies assessed will achieve no more than 19% CO2 reduction by 2030. Some reacted defensively—slamming the methodology or calling it “comparing apples and oranges.” Others used it as a wake-up call. The Index also served as a precursor to preliminary legal investigations, indicating our intent to possibly bring more lawsuits.
In 2023, three polluting companies publicly presented climate plans that meet our requirements.
Nigerian farmers and their communities will receive 15 million euros in compensation for the oil pollution in their villages. The pollution was caused by leakages in Shell pipelines. A leak detection system should prevent future oil spills. According to Milieudefensie, this court case shows large-scale polluters all over the world that they can no longer get away with destructive practices.
In 2008 the farmers and fishermen together with Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), initiated legal proceedings against the headquarters of Shell in The Hague because of the oil pollution on their land. The pollution took place between 2004 and 2007 in the villages of Oruma, Goi and Ikot Ada Udo in Nigeria. Now, over 15 years later, the farmers and their fellow villagers are to receive justice. See also: oil spills Nigeria (2021).
Our Goal: To stop Shell from causing further serious climate damage.
What we did: With the support of over 17,000 co-plaintiffs and many others who supported us financially, we took Shell to court. Our demand: For Shell to commit to reducing its CO2 emissions by 45% by the year 2030.
What we achieved: This was our biggest win ever. On 26 May 2021, we wrote history. The judge ruled that Shell is a key contributor to major climate change, and that the company must do more to remedy this situation. This is the first time that a company is being forced to align its policies with the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement.
Photograph: many of our co-plaintiffs in front of the Shell headquarter in The Hague, where they delivered the summons to appear in court.
Cover foto (top): director Donald Pols of Milieudefensie leaves the court house and shows the verdict to waiting co-plaintiffs and staff of Milieudefensie.
In brief: The court has ordered Shell to reduce its CO2 emissions by net 45% by 2030 (compared to 2019). Shell must also make an effort to bring down CO2 emissions from its suppliers and customers by net 45% (2030). It must do this by changing its company policy. The judge has also established that companies are responsible for protecting human rights throughout their chain of production by limiting CO2 emissions, including those of their business relations and customers.
>Read more about this historic victory
Our Goal: To force Shell to clean up its oil spills in Nigeria.
What we did: Together with 4 Nigerian farmers, Milieudefensie sued Shell in an effort to establish the company’s liability for the oil spills in the Niger Delta.
What we achieved: The trial, held in the Netherlands, constituted the first time that a Dutch company was held responsible in a Dutch court of law for pollution in a foreign country. The judge ruled that Shell was indeed liable for the environmental damage in one of three villages. Both Milieudefensie and Shell appealed the courPhotograph: one of many demonstrations to stop the exploitation of shalegas.t’s decision. It took until January 2021 before a final verdict was reached, 13 years since the case was first initiated. But it was worth the wait: Shell was convicted. A big win for climate justice and the people living in the Niger Delta.
Photograph: Eric Dooh Goi (m) , a member of the Nigerian embassee (r) and elder Friday (l) at the courthouse in The Hague.
This ruling also serves as a warning to other Dutch multinationals involved in injustices world-wide. The ruling gives victims of environmental pollution, land-grabbing or exploitation a better change of winning a legal battle.
>Read the full story of the Shell Nigeria court case
Our Goal: To make polluting companies pay for the CO2 they emit.
What we did: For 12 years, we campaigned for a CO2 tax. We carried out research, published reports, compiled a proposal for a CO2 law and we asked the public for their opinion on the proposed law.
What we achieved: On 15 December 2020, the bill for a CO2 tax for industrial companies was passed by the Dutch Senate and the Netherlands became the first country in the world with a CO2 tax for industrial companies. The bill is by no means perfect, but it is a good start.
Our Goal: A Dutch climate law.
What we did: In 2007, Milieudefensie, together with Natuur & Milieu and Milieudefensie’s youth organisation JMA, started a campaign for an ambitious climate act, presenting a comprehensive legal text as a possible template.
Photograph: Milieudefensie asks for a climate act in the Hofvijver, a pond in front of the office of the prime minister (then J.P. Balkenende).
What we achieved: Ten years on, the Netherlands finally adopted a climate act, which states that the Netherlands must reduce CO2 emissions by 95% by the year 2050 (compared to 1990).
The Netherlands are not the first country to adopt a climate act. These countries preceded us: France, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Finland, Denmark, Mexico and Sweden. The EU now also has a climate act.
A climate act legally enshrines a country’s commitment to a final objective and also, in some cases, to intermediate goals. In most countries that have adopted a climate act, this proved a boost to climate policy. That is certainly the case for the Netherlands, that always ranked low in European climate listings. On paper, our climate policy has since improved. Yet it is too early to say how this is turning out in practice.
Our Goal: To prevent on-going exploitation of shale gas in the Netherlands.
What we did: Local residents asked their municipalities to declare themselves shale gas-free areas.
What we achieved: 223 out of a total of 388 Dutch municipalities and 10 of the 12 provinces committed to this declaration, blocking all shale gas exploitation in their respective jurisdictions. In 2015, the government subsequently issued a national ban on the drilling for shale gas.
Shale gas was, at that time, still in its infancy in the Netherlands. But many plans had been developed. We prevented their implementation. As a result, an estimated 200 to 500 billion m3 of shale gas (a TNO estimate from 2013) will remain in the ground.
Photograph: one of the many demonstrations to stop the exploitation of shalegas.
Our website uses cookies to ensure the use and functionality of this website. Read more about our cookie policy
